2026 Senate forecastThe Upper Chamber

← All 35 races

MA · Senate 2026 · Updated Aug 27, 2026, 2:03 a.m. ET

Massachusetts

Rated Solid D

Ed Markey wins this seat in >99 in 100 simulations. Call it all but certain.

  • Ed MarkeyDIncumbent>99 in 100
  • John DeatonR<1 in 100

Over time

How the forecast has moved

0255075100AprJulOctJan ’26AprJulD >99 in 100R <1 in 100Aug 27, 2026
Chance in 100 the seat goes to each side: blue for the Democratic caucus, red for the Republicans · one point per day · hover or tap to read the lines

The margin

How close it lands

Each simulation produces a final margin. The curve shows where those margins fall; the tinted areas on either side of even are the futures each party wins.

EvenD +31.7
John Deaton aheadEd Markey ahead →
Where the simulated margins land · marker at the average margin

Under the hood

What's driving the number

The forecast blends a weighted poll average with a fundamentals model: the state's partisan lean, incumbency, the national environment, and fundraising. Positive points favor the Democratic side of the margin; negative favor the Republican side.

  • Partisan leanD +27.3
  • IncumbencyD +2.5
  • National environmentD +5.1
  • FundraisingD +1.1
  • Fundamentals sayD +35.9
  • The polls sayD +25.0
  • Blended forecast marginD +31.7

The blend puts 39 percent of its weight on the polls and 61 percent on the fundamentals; polls take over as more arrive and election day nears.

The markets

What the betting markets say

Prediction markets put a price on this seat too: what people are paying for a contract that pays out if Ed Markey wins, read as an implied probability. Shown for comparison only. This is not betting advice, and market prices never feed the model.

  • Ed Markey winsThis forecast>99 in 100
  • Ed Markey winsKalshi97 in 100
  • Ed Markey winsPolymarket98 in 100

Market prices as of Aug 27, 2026, 2:03 a.m. ET

The evidence

The polls, as the model sees them

Every public poll of this race, with the weight the model gave it in the latest run. Weights reward recency, sample size, and pollster track record; the house adjustment corrects each pollster's habitual lean before averaging.

PollDatesSampleD–RMarginHouse adj.Weight
University of New HampshireAug 20–24881 LV49–30D +19.0−1.174%
UMass Amherst / YouGovAug 5–12800 RV51–30D +21.0+0.125%
University of New HampshireJun 18–23623 LV50–34D +16.0−1.1<1%
Suffolk UniversityJun 8–12500 LV55–30D +25.0+1.2<1%
University of New HampshireApr 16–20603 LV55–32D +23.0−1.1<1%
University of New HampshireFeb 12–16620 LV56–27D +29.0−1.1<1%
Cygnal (R)Jan 22–25800 LV54–30D +24.0+1.2<1%
Suffolk UniversityNov 19–23500 RV54–31D +23.0+1.20%
SurveyUSAFeb 28–Mar 4775 RV45–26D +19.0+1.80%

How the weights, the blend, and the simulation work is spelled out on the methodology page.