2026 Senate forecastThe Upper Chamber

← All 35 races

NH · Senate 2026 · Updated Aug 27, 2026, 2:03 a.m. ET

New Hampshire

Rated Lean D

Chris Pappas wins this seat in 77 in 100 simulations. Call it favored, but far from certain.

  • Portrait of Chris PappasChris PappasD77 in 100
  • Portrait of John E. SununuJohn E. SununuR23 in 100

Over time

How the forecast has moved

0255075100AprJulOctJan ’26AprJulD 77 in 100R 23 in 100Aug 27, 2026
Chance in 100 the seat goes to each side: blue for the Democratic caucus, red for the Republicans · one point per day · hover or tap to read the lines

The margin

How close it lands

Each simulation produces a final margin. The curve shows where those margins fall; the tinted areas on either side of even are the futures each party wins.

EvenD +5.8
John E. Sununu aheadChris Pappas ahead →
Where the simulated margins land · marker at the average margin

Under the hood

What's driving the number

The forecast blends a weighted poll average with a fundamentals model: the state's partisan lean, incumbency, the national environment, and fundraising. Positive points favor the Democratic side of the margin; negative favor the Republican side.

  • Partisan leanD +3.9
  • IncumbencyEven
  • National environmentD +5.1
  • FundraisingD +0.8
  • Fundamentals sayD +9.8
  • The polls sayD +2.1
  • Blended forecast marginD +5.8

The blend puts 53 percent of its weight on the polls and 47 percent on the fundamentals; polls take over as more arrive and election day nears.

The markets

What the betting markets say

Prediction markets put a price on this seat too: what people are paying for a contract that pays out if Chris Pappas wins, read as an implied probability. Shown for comparison only. This is not betting advice, and market prices never feed the model.

  • Chris Pappas winsThis forecast77 in 100
  • Chris Pappas winsKalshi86 in 100
  • Chris Pappas winsPolymarket88 in 100

Market prices as of Aug 27, 2026, 2:03 a.m. ET

The evidence

The polls, as the model sees them

Every public poll of this race, with the weight the model gave it in the latest run. Weights reward recency, sample size, and pollster track record; the house adjustment corrects each pollster's habitual lean before averaging.

PollDatesSampleD–RMarginHouse adj.Weight
University of New HampshireAug 20–241,878 LV43–45R +2.0−1.160%
Saint Anselm CollegeAug 17–181,411 LV48–41D +7.0+0.738%
Peak Insights (R)Jun 24–27500 LV43–42D +1.0<1%
Saint Anselm CollegeJun 24–251,614 RV47–41D +6.0+0.7<1%
University of New HampshireJun 18–232,232 LV47–44D +3.0−1.1<1%
University of New HampshireApr 17–211,295 LV49–42D +7.0−1.1<1%
Emerson CollegeMar 21–231,000 LV45–44D +1.0+0.9<1%
Saint Anselm CollegeMar 16–181,491 RV46–43D +3.0+0.7<1%
yes. every kid.Jan 28–29563 LV45–41D +4.0<1%
University of New HampshireJan 15–192,053 LV50–45D +5.0−1.1<1%
NHJournal/Praecones AnalyticaDec 26–28603 RV42–36D +6.0<1%
Guidant Polling and Strategy (R)Dec 9–11600 LV47–44D +3.00%
Saint Anselm CollegeNov 18–192,212 RV44–41D +3.0+0.70%
co/efficient (R)Oct 9–131,034 LV45–42D +3.0−0.60%
University of New HampshireSep 17–231,235 LV49–43D +6.0−1.10%
co/efficient (R)Sep 10–12904 LV46–43D +3.0−0.60%
1892 Polling (R)Sep 2–4500 LV45–43D +2.0−0.40%
Quantus Insights (R)Mar 17–19650 RV44–53R +9.00%

How the weights, the blend, and the simulation work is spelled out on the methodology page.